Official Luthiers Forum! http://www-.luthiersforum.com/forum/ |
|
Lefty becomes Righty http://www-.luthiersforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10102&t=5457 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Michael Dale Payne [ Sun Mar 05, 2006 4:26 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Well several months ago I bought my self a very zootful set of qlt'd sapele just for my self. Well as things go I has a left handed player plunk down deposit and order a SJ. He went through my limited stash and guess which set he picked. ![]() As the story goes I got the top and back plates joined rim built and profiled for a lefty cutaway and was about to start attaching lining when I get this phone call telling me that he needs to cancel his order and need as much of his deposit back as possible because of a family problem that I wont go into. Anyway I now have a lefty cutaway rim. Hummmm what to do with it> ![]() Next was what to do about the profile since I had profiled the back edge. I set and pondered about this for about an hour last night and decided to cut off the profile so that both sides are parallel again. This will leave me with a 3-1/8" wide rim. I have scribed the line but have not cut it yet. So it looks like I will be building my first Thin-Line SJ ![]() Ok now I have a question. Do I need to change the size of the sound hole to accommodate the reduced air volume? Allen? Where are you? I need your wisdom? ![]() |
Author: | Dave White [ Sun Mar 05, 2006 6:09 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Michael, I ended up having to build a slimline model via an "accident of fate" as well: Slim Jim This was at it's deepest at 3 7/8" at the waist and 3 5/8" deep at the tail and heel blocks. I left the soundhole at the same 4 1/8" diameter as it would have been had the tail depth been 4 7/8" as planned. I just loved the sound of that guitar. So I would be tempted to do your sound hole as normal. Al will probably give you better advice on the soundhole size tradeoff though. |
Author: | Michael Dale Payne [ Sun Mar 05, 2006 6:36 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Dave I am ending up 3.378 at the lower and 3.25 upper after top and back. pretty thin ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | RussellR [ Sun Mar 05, 2006 7:35 am ] |
Post subject: | |
You could always send it to me Michael, I'm a Lefty ![]() |
Author: | Michael Dale Payne [ Sun Mar 05, 2006 8:19 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Too late ...done cut it ![]() |
Author: | Dave White [ Sun Mar 05, 2006 8:29 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Michael, Yes but the top and back will give you some extra height - maybe up to 1/4". Your idea of leaving the kerfed lining proud will also help - my binding ledges end up cut back to the kerfed linings anyway. This could get you another 1/2" or so in total with careful binding routing. So there's another 3/4" height potentially. Unless the heights you are quoting including allowance for this already ![]() |
Author: | Michael Dale Payne [ Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:15 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Rim is now 3.125" at the LB and 2.875" at the UB Looks like 3 3/8" total at LB and 3 1/8" at UB will be the finished dimensions I don't want to raise the lining too high and that would mean I would have to add splice plates to the blocks to match the lining height anyway, So I will live with it thin. Who knows I may be suprised with the sound. Just a bit worried about its volume though. |
Author: | Dave White [ Mon Mar 06, 2006 5:29 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Michael, Tim McKnight ended up making a dread that ws 3" at the tail and 2" at the neck via "serendipity" and as I recall he was very surprised and pleased at the sound that resulted. Maybe you can pm him for advice on soundhole size. |
Author: | CarltonM [ Mon Mar 06, 2006 7:52 am ] |
Post subject: | |
[QUOTE=MichaelP] Who knows I may be suprised with the sound. Just a bit worried about its volume though.[/QUOTE] Michael, I just know there's a performer out there who would LOVE to have a hand-built, solid-wood, thin-bodied, amplified stage guitar of the quality you produce! It'll look good, play right, and be easy to hold for four sets a night. Might even lead to commissions. |
Author: | Michael Dale Payne [ Mon Mar 06, 2006 8:16 am ] |
Post subject: | |
This baby is mine one way or another ![]() ![]() |
Author: | CarltonM [ Mon Mar 06, 2006 9:28 am ] |
Post subject: | |
[QUOTE=MichaelP] This baby is mine one way or another ![]() ![]() Yeah, but if you find it to be disappointing compared to your full-depth instruments, I bet there's someone who will find it to be just right for performing. Could be "lemonade out of lemons." Besides, there's always the Ovation, right (or the OM!)? ![]() A big tip-of-the-hat, BTW, for the way you've been helping others in need. You must see a lot of smiling faces when your guitars are involved! |
Author: | Michael Dale Payne [ Mon Mar 06, 2006 9:33 am ] |
Post subject: | |
The Ovation is my monument to Mr. Murphy ![]() |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |